(b) The foregoing shall not apply if:
(1) within two (2) business days of receipt of the ICPC priority placement request, the sending state Compact Administrator determines that the ICPC request documentation is substantially insufficient, specifies that additional information is needed, and requests the additional documentation from the sending agency. The request shall be made by fax, or by telephone if fax is not available, or
(2) within two (2) business days of receipt of the ICPC priority placement request, the receiving state Compact Administrator notifies the sending state Compact Administrator that further information is necessary. Such notice shall specifically detail the information needed. For a case in which this subparagraph applies, the twenty (20) business day period for the receiving state Compact Administrator to complete action shall be calculated from the date of the receipt by the receiving state Compact Administrator of the information requested.
(c) Where the sending state court is not itself the sending agency, it is the responsibility of the sending agency to keep the court, which issued the priority order, informed of the status of the priority request.
(a) the proposed placement recipient is a relative belonging to a class of persons who, under Article VIII(a) of ICPC could receive a child from another person belonging to such a class, without complying with ICPC and; (1) the child is under two (2) years of age; or (2) the child is in an emergency shelter; or (3) the court finds that the child has spent a substantial amount of time in the home of the proposed placement recipient.
(b) the receiving state Compact Administrator has a properly completed ICPC-100A and supporting documentation for over thirty (30) business days, but the sending agency has not received a notice pursuant to Article III (d) of ICPC determining whether the child may or may not be placed.
This regulation is adopted pursuant to Article VII of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children by action of the Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children at its annual meeting on April 28, 1996, in Whitefish, Montana.
Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC)
Priority Placement
Effective October 1, 1996, ICPC Regulation No. 7 establishes ICPC procedures for the out-of-state priority placement of children. ICPC Regulation No. 7 sets forth limited circumstances under which this procedure may be used.
The court order finding entitlement to a priority placement shall not be valid unless it contains an express finding that one or more of the following circumstances applies to a particular case and sets the facts on which the court bases its findings:
(a) the proposed placement recipient is a relative belonging to a class of persons who under Article VIII (a)2 of ICPC could receive a child from another person belonging to such a class without complying with ICPC, and (1) the child must be under two (2) years of age; or (2) the child is in an emergency shelter, or the court finds that the child has spent a substantial amount of time in the home of the proposed placement recipient.
(b) the receiving state Compact Administrator has a properly completed ICPC-100A and supporting documentation for over thirty (30) business days, but the sending agency has not received a notice pursuant to Article III (d) of ICPC determining whether the child may or may not be placed.
The court order and finding must contain the typed name, address, telephone number, and, if available, the fax number of the judge and the court issuing the order. Additionally, the court order must be signed by its issuing judge.
A booklet on Priority Placement procedures has been developed and can be obtained for a cost of $9 from:
Office of the ICPC Secretariat
810 First Street, NE, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20002-4267
ARTICLE VIII-LIMITATIONS
This compact shall not apply to: (a) the sending or bringing of a child into a receiving state by his parent, stepparent, grandparent, adult brother or sister, adult uncle or aunt, or his guardian and leaving the child with any such relative or nonagency guardian in the receiving state.